Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Education, 2022, 4(10); doi: 10.25236/IJNDE.2022.041015.

Implementation of Assessment for Learning in Hong Kong Classrooms


Jie Wen

Corresponding Author:
Jie Wen

The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China


This paper focuses on the 'Assessment for Learning' reform proposal highlighted in a Hong Kong government paper, one of the most important reform proposals that has generated intense debate and a wealth of scholarly work in the Hong Kong education academic community. This paper analyses and compares two articles that also focus on this area to determine how the policy will be implemented in Hong Kong classrooms between 2014 and 2021, and on this basis, it also provides some insights into the future development of the policy.


Hong Kong classroom, Assessment for Learning, Education Reform

Cite This Paper

Jie Wen. Implementation of Assessment for Learning in Hong Kong Classrooms. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 10: 75-80. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2022.041015.


[1] Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 199-211.

[3] Biggs, J. (1998) ‘The assessment scene in Hong Kong’, in P. Stimpson and P. Morris (eds.), Curriculum and Assessment for Hong Kong: Two Components, One System. Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press. pp. 315–214.

[4] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.

[5] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5-31.

[6] Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(1), 39-54.

[7] Carless, D. (2011) From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-Heritage Settings. New York, NY: Routledge.

[8] Chen, R. T. H. (2014). East-Asian teaching practices through the eyes of Western learners. Teaching in higher education, 19(1), 26-37.

[9] Chng, L. S., & Lund, J. (2018). Assessment for learning in physical education: The what, why and how. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(8), 29-34.

[10] Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 1-46.

[11] Curriculum Development Council. (2001). Exemplars of curriculum development in schools. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer. 

[12] Curriculum Development Council. (2004). English language education key learning area: English language curriculum guide (Primary 1-6). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.

[13] Day, C. (1999). Developing Teachers: The Challenge of Lifelong Learning, London and NY: Rutledge Falmer.

[14] Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

[15] Farrell, T. S. (2008). Here's the book, go teach the class' ELT practicum support. RELC Journal, 39(2), 226-241.

[16] Graue, M. E. (1993). Integrating theory and practice through instructional assessment. Educational Assessment, 1(4), 283-309.

[17] Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The impact of testing practices on teaching. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 487-504). Springer, Boston, MA.

[18] Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

[19] Izadinia, M. (2016). Student teachers’ and mentor teachers’ perceptions and expectations of a mentoring relationship: do they match or clash?. Professional development in education, 42(3), 387-402.

[20] Jackson, R. R. (2009). Never work harder than your students, and other principles of great teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

[21] Lam, R. (2016). Implementing assessment for learning in a Confucian context: The case of Hong Kong 2004–14. The Sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, 2, 756-771.

[22] Lee, I. (2009). A new look at an old problem: how teachers can liberate themselves from the drudgery of marking student writing. Prospect: An Australian Journal of Teaching/Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), 24(2), 34-41.

[23] Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34-50.

[24] Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24.

[25] Mak, P., & Lee, I. (2014). Implementing assessment for learning in L2 writing: An activity theory perspective. System, 47, 73-87.

[26] Mena, J., Hennissen, P., & Loughran, J. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers' professional knowledge of teaching: The influence of mentoring. Teaching and teacher education, 66, 47-59.

[27] Morris, P., Adamson, B., Chan, K. K. et al. (1999) The project on feedback and assessment. Final Report (Hong Kong, Hong Kong University).

[28] Morris, P., Lo, M. L. & Adamson, B. (2000) Improving schools in Hong Kong: lessons from the past, in: B. Adamson, T. Kwan & K. K. Chan (Eds) Changing the curriculum: the impact of reform on Hong Kong’s primary schools Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Pr.

[29] Smith, K., & Lev‐Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre‐service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289-302.

[30] Tan, C. (2019). Competence or performance? A Bernsteinian analysis of basic competency assessment in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Studies, 67(2), 235-250.

[31] Wiliam, D. (2009). Assessment for learning: Why, what and how? London: Institute of Education, University of London.

[32] Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1), 3-14.

[33] Yuan, E. R. (2016). The dark side of mentoring on pre-service language teachers' identity formation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 188-197.

[34] Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2014). Pre-service teachers' changing beliefs in the teaching practicum: Three cases in an EFL context. System, 44, 1-12.

[35] Xie, Q., & Lei, Y. (2019). formative assessment in primary English writing classes: A case study from Hong Kong. Asian EFL Journal, 23(5), 55-95.

[36] Xie, Q., & Cui, Y. (2021). Preservice teachers’ implementation of formative assessment in English writing class: Mentoring matters. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101019.

[37] Zeng, K. (1999). Dragon gate. A&C Black.