In July 2015, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress formally authorized the Supreme People's Procuratorate to carry out administrative public interest litigation pilot work in Beijing, Shandong, Jiangsu and other regions. Two years later, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress decided to write the administrative public interest litigation system into the Administrative Procedure Law, and since then the administrative public interest litigation has formally become a binding legal system. In October 2019, the Supreme People's Procuratorate decided to solve more public welfare problems before litigation as a new direction of work. Compared with some foreign countries, China's administrative public interest litigation system is not yet mature, in-depth research, provisions are not clear, as an important part of the system, there are also many problems in the pre-litigation procuratorial suggestions. In order to ensure the effective implementation of the procuratorial suggestion before the prosecution, to play its legislative role, and to safeguard the public interest from a more powerful perspective of the procuratorial organs, this paper will theoretically analyze the connotation, characteristics and principles of the procuratorial suggestion, and find out the problems in the implementation from the reality, and put forward the author's suggestions.

Zi Wang. Research on the Pre-Litigation Procuratorial Suggestion of Administrative Public Interest Litigation in China. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 14: 25-30. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051405.

[1] Civil and Administrative Procuratorial Office of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, Practice and Exploration of Public Interest Litigation by Procuratorial Organs, China Procuratorial Press, 108 (2017).

[2] Wang Mingyuan. On the Development Direction of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China: An Analysis Based on the Theory of the Relationship between Administrative Power and Judicial Power [J]. China Law, 2016 (1): 49-68.

[3] Zhang Bin, Zhang Yibo. Analysis of the Basic Theory of Pre-litigation Procedure of Administrative Public Interest Litigation [J]. People's Procuratorate, 2017 (4): 62-65.

[4] Wang Li. Research on Judicial Democracy in Contemporary China [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2016: 86.

[5] Hou Yinping, Chen Dingliang, Zhang Feng. Review on the Practice of Pre-litigation Procedure of Administrative Public Interest Litigation [J]. Journal of Soochow University (Law Edition), 2020, 7 (2): 78-86.

[6] Xie Wenbo, Win-Win Mechanism of Administrative Public Interest Litigation, Shanghai Journal of Law Studies, Vol. 8, 2019, pp. 15-24.