Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 5(14); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051411.

Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory and Its Implications in SLA

Author(s)

Chenchieh Su

Corresponding Author:
Chenchieh Su
Affiliation(s)

School of Foreign Languages, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China

Abstract

Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimension theory is among the most influential theories in the field of intercultural communication. It has played a pivotal role in the study of intercultural management, marketing, human resources, and intercultural teaching and learning. This study briefly introduces Hofstede's cultural dimension theory, explores the application of the theory in the field of Second Language Acquisition, and offers suggestions for strengthening the intercultural communication competence and performance of second language learners.

Keywords

Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory, Intercultural communication, SLA

Cite This Paper

Chenchieh Su. Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory and Its Implications in SLA. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 14: 57-61. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051411.

References

[1] Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. BeverlyHills, CA: Sage. 

[2] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[3] Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long-versus short-term orientation: new perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493-504.

[4] Hofstede, G. (2010). The GLOBE debate: Back to Relevance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1339-46.

[5] Robinson-Stuart, G., & Nocon, H. (1996). Second Culture Acquisition: Ethnography in the Second Foreign Language Classroom Modern Language Journal, 87, 365-374.

[6] Schumann, J. H. (1978). The Pidgination Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

[7] Condon, E. (1982). Cross-Cultural interference Affecting Teacher- Pupil Communication: Intercultural communication. Belmont: Wadsworth.

[8] Johnoson, M. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.

[9] Powell, G., & Anderson, J. (1994). Culture and Classroom communication, Belmont: Wadsworth.

[10] Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications Inc.

[11] Cumming, A. (2004). Alternatives in TESOL research: Descriptive, interpretive, and ideological orientation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 673-703.

[12] Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.