Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 5(16); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051614.

Reflection on the Normative Intent of Article 16 of China’s Company Law

Author(s)

Kunyuan Jiang

Corresponding Author:
Kunyuan Jiang
Affiliation(s)

Faculty of Law, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China

Abstract

The ultra vires guarantee by the legal representative of a company not only involves the general rules of the Contract Law, the Guarantee Law and the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, but also should consider its nature as a commercial act and take into account the legislative intent of the Company Law. In judicial practice, the regulation of the company’s ultra vires guarantee is scattered and blurred, still needing improvement. Before the advent of the judicial interpretation of the Guarantee Law, the system of legal interpretation and application process was confusing and lacked legal basis. Article 16 of the Company Law affirms the company’s ability to provide external guarantees. In the academic circle, the dispute on the effectiveness of the company’s ultra vires guarantee often revolves around the nature of Article 16 of the Company Law. But in essence, Article 16 is a rule to regulate corporate governance, and its legislative purpose is to regulate the process of intention formation of the company’s external guarantee. To examine the effectiveness of the legal representative’s ultra vires guarantee, one must take into account the interpretation of the intention expression process. The process from the company’s intention formation to the intention expression is not only a significant part to judge the validity of the ultra vires guarantee contract, but also the true representation of the normative intent of Article 16 of the Company Law.

Keywords

Article 16 of China’s Company Law, Ultra Vires External Guarantee, Company Resolution

Cite This Paper

Kunyuan Jiang. Reflection on the Normative Intent of Article 16 of China’s Company Law. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 16: 85-92. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051614.

References

[1] The National People's Congress of China. Company Law [S]. 2018: Article 16. 

[2] Gao S P. Re-discussion on the Legal Effect of the Company’s Legal Representative’s Ultra vires Guarantee [J]. Modern Law Science, 2021, 43(06): 18-34.

[3] Zhou L J. Rules of Defining the Validity of the Contract to Provide External Security by Company [J]. Journal of Law Application, 2014(08): 2-9.

[4] Xie T. Study on Legal Rules of Corporate External Guarantee [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu University of Political Science and Law, 2022. 

[5] The Supreme People’s Court of China. Civil Judgement No. Minshenzi 1006/2016[EB/OL]. [2022-11.03].https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=sn9LzUg2BAT1n0F9hV26tTGU0WabwbzAQf9eUIHurMEnitNJzezrTZ/dgBYosE2g7LPywO5GJzBhNAER7taQoS4+eCV2N54BQnAaCY17r5QzHkpmZGIl5I3UecIvJECC

[6] Gao S P. Studies on Legal Issues Related to Corporate Guarantee [J]. China Legal Science, 2013(02): 104-114.

[7] Civil Judgement No. Chuan1502minchu 5475/2016.

[8] Zou H L. Logical Analysis of the System of Company Representative’s Ultra vires Guarantee—Centering on Paragraph 1 of Article 16 of the Company Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2019, 41(05): 63-82.

[9] The Supreme People’s Court of China. Civil Judgement No. Mintizi 156/2012. [EB/OL].[2022-11-03].https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=clmgJ9BiZfaUC81U5TdDfnv8tONKqAJ08QwUDdztVNeYTVE+2KO5sJ/dgBYosE2g7LPywO5GJzBhNAER7taQoS4+eCV2N54BQnAaCY17r5StJBP6BM3jh/WJFFeTNaSE

[10] Liu J H. Institutional Innovations of New Corporate Law: Legislative and Judicial Controversies [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2006: 108.

[11] Higher People's Court of Beijing. Guiding Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases Involving Company-related Disputes[S]. 2008: Article 6.

[12] Hu X D. Judicial Continuation of Corporate Guarantee Rules—Empirical Analysis Based on 145 Judgments. Civil and Commercial Law Review VOL.50. Beijing: Law Press, 2012: 74.

[13] Deng F. General Corporation Law. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2009: 136.

[14] The Supreme People's Court of China. Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court of the Application of the Relevant Guarantee System of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China[S]. 2020: Article 7.

[15] The National People’s Congress of China. Civil Code[S]. 2020: Article 61.

[16] The National People’s Congress of China. Civil Code[S]. 2020: Article 504.

[17] Zeng D P. Effect of Company's: External Guarantee Beyond Its Authority- A Review Based on Legal Interpretation Methods. ECUPL Journal, 2013(05): 76-89.

[18] Chen F. Research on the Effectiveness of Ultra Vires Guarantee Contract of the Legal Representative of the Company [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2021.

[19] The National People’s Congress of China. Civil Code[S]. 2020: Article 61 (3).

[20] The Supreme People’s Court of China. Minutes of the National Court Work Conference on Civil and Commercial Trials[S]. 2019: Article 17.

[21] Shi T T. The Pitfall in Article 16 of China’s Company Law: Teleological Interpretation and Judicial Application [J]. Modern Law Science, 2019, 41(03): 111-126.

[22] Wang L. On the Difference between Resolution Act and Contractual Act in China's Civil Code [J]. Studies in Law and Business, 2018(05): 130.

[23] Qian Y L. Normal Meaning of Article 16 of Chinese Company Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2011, 33(06): 126-135.

[24] Wang Z J. General Provisions of the Civil Law. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2001: 185.