Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 5(17); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051712.

The Legal Balance between Freedom of the Press and National Security in the United States

Author(s)

Qinglin Li

Corresponding Author:
Qinglin Li
Affiliation(s)

Law School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

Abstract

In the United States, the conflict between press freedom and national security can be attributed to the dispute over the press’s claimed right and the government’s claimed right. To be more specific, the press claims that it has the right to publish classified national security information freely and preserve the confidentiality of news sources. In response to claims which makes by the press, the government argues that it has the right to censor publication in advance and compel journalists to identify news sources who leak classified information. Based on the importance of freedom of the press and national security, the U.S. courts usually uses legal balance to deal with the above-mentioned conflict. According to the results, the United States emphasizes the importance of freedom of press in the legal balance between press freedom and national security, and regards the guarantee and maintenance of national security as an exception. This practice is worth of other countries’ vigilance, because national security is a basic prerequisite for national survival and development. Only when the national security interests are guaranteed can a country realize the freedom of the press in a real sense.

Keywords

Freedom of press, National security, Classified national security information, Legal balance

Cite This Paper

Qinglin Li. The Legal Balance between Freedom of the Press and National Security in the United States. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 17: 76-82. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051712.

References

[1] Werhan, K. (2008) Rethinking Freedom of the Press After 9/11, Tulane Law Review, 07, 1562-1605.

[2] Hunold, C. (2001) Corporatism, Pluralism and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 02, 96-105.

[3] Christie, George C. (1986) Why the First Amendment Should Not Be Interpreted from the Pathological Perspective: A Response to Professor Blasi, Duke law journal, 04, 683-695.

[4] Yilu Zuo. (2018) Algorithms and Speech: Theory and Practice of the United States, Global Law Review, 05, 122-139.

[5] Feng Wu. (2018) The Latest Progress and Influence of "Algorithm News" in Developed Countries, Editorial Friend, 05, 48-54.

[6] Bin Liu, Qian Zou. (2010) A Comparative Study of Press Freedom between China and the United States--Taking Safeguarding National Security as an Example, Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences), 12, 81-85.

[7] Feng Jiang. (2007) Jefferson and the Establishment of Freedom of the Press in America, Journal of Gansu University of Political Science and Law, 06, 42-47.

[8] Xiaoyuan Zeng. (2004) An Analysis of the "Freedom of the Press" in America, China Radio & TV Academic Journal, 10, 78-79.

[9] Xingping Kang. (2001) "Press Freedom" in the United States after 9/11, 11, Shanghai Journalism Review, 22-24.