Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 5(18); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051819.

The Copyright Dilemma and Solution for “Data-Driven Creation”

Author(s)

Jiehua Lu

Corresponding Author:
Jiehua Lu
Affiliation(s)

School of Law and Intellectual Property, Foshan University, Foshan, China

Abstract

“Data-driven creation” means that data plays an important role in the creation of works and distribution of content. Big data has brought new challenges to the copyright legal regime while driving innovation in the copyright industry. First, the data-driven creation of works has shifted from “supply-oriented” to “demand-oriented”, and the main body of creation has shifted from “author-centrism” to “reader-centrism”. Second, the free use of data is the key to creative quality, and the boundaries of fair use should be appropriately expanded. Finally, data-driven creation brings negative problems such as algorithmic bias, information cocoon, and data monopoly, and a collaborative governance approach should be sought to ensure the healthy development of the industry.

Keywords

Data-driven creation; Copyright; Reader-centrism; Fair use; Data monopoly

Cite This Paper

Jiehua Lu. The Copyright Dilemma and Solution for “Data-Driven Creation”. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 18: 112-117. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051819.

References

[1] Niu Wenjia, Liu Jiqiang, Shi Chuan. User Web Behavior Pictorial - User Web Behavior Pictorial Analysis and Content Recommendation Application in Big Data [M]. Electronic Industry Press, 2016:4.

[2] Lin Xiuqin, Liu Wenxian. Author-centrism and its Crisis of Legitimacy - a Philosophical Investigation based on the Authorship System [J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2015(2).

[3] Liu Wenxian. From Creative Authorship to Functional Authorship: The Rise and Fall of Copyright Author-centrism in the Perspective of the Subject Paradigm [J]. Xiamen University Law Review, 2016(2).

[4] Zhang Yongqing. Authorship in the Historical Process - Four Dominant Paradigms of Western Authorship Theory [J]. Academic Monthly, 2015(11).

[5] Zhang Yonglu, Liu Weidong. Artificial Intelligence Writing: a New Landscape for Creative Writing [J]. Exploration and Controversy, 2021(3).

[6] Wang Guozhu. Analysis and Legislative Construction of the Implied License of Copyright "Opt-Out"[J]. Contemporary Jurisprudence, 2015(3).

[7] Wang Wenmig, Gao Jun. Copyright Exception Rules for Library Information Analysis in the Era of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Library Forum, 2020(9).

[8] AMY ADLER. Fair use and the future of art [J]. New York University Law Review, 2016, 91(3)

[9] Xiong Qi. The Local Law Interpretation of Transformative Use of Copyright [J]. The Jurist, 2019(2).

[10] Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc. 954 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

[11] Ye Jun. Research on the Legal Definition Model of Operator Concentration [J]. Chinese Jurisprudence, 2015(5).

[12] Sun Jin, Zhong Yuan. Antitrust Law Analysis of Data Constituting Essential Facilities in the Era of Big Data [J]. Electronic Intellectual Property Rights, 2018(5).