Frontiers in Educational Research, 2022, 5(21); doi: 10.25236/FER.2022.052116.
1Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai, China
This paper attempts to depict a general picture of hedging devices by looking into related research. To be more specific, it will focus on three main dimensions: 1) an overview of the definition and different classifications of hedging devices; and 2) applications of hedging devices in different cultural contexts. By examining critical aspects of hedges, suggestions relating to teaching writing with hedges will be given at the end of this paper.
hedging devices, intercultural differences, teaching writing
Yun Zheng. A General Analysis of Hedges in Writing and Its Implications on Teaching Writing. Frontiers in Educational Research (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 21: 71-74. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.052116.
 Chen, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), pp.1-34.
 Clyne, M. (1987). Discourse structures and discourse expectations: Implications for Anglo-German academic communication in English. Discourse across cultures: Strategies in world Englishes, (s73), 83.
 Čmejrková, S. (1996). Academic writing in Czech and English. Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.137-152.
 Hu, G., Cao, F., (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: a comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, pp. 2795-2809.
 Hu, C., & Li, X. (2015). Epistemic Modality in the Argumentative Essays of Chinese EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 8(6), pp.20-31.
 Hyland, K. (1996) Writing without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles, Applied Linguistics, 17(4), pp.433-454
 Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Second Language Writing, 6(2), pp.183-205.
 Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(3), pp.349-382.
 Hyland, K. (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum, London.
 Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study of in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8, pp. 183-228.
 Lee, I., Yu, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Hong Kong secondary students’ motivation in EFL writing: A survey study. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), pp.176-187.
Yalo M , Nafiu A . Factor Analysis of Small and Medium Enterprises' Challenges and Its Implications on Poverty and Unemployment in Dekina[J]. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 2016, 1(2):1-12.
 Rezanejad, A., Lari, Z., & Mosalli, Z. (2015). A cross-cultural analysis of the use of hedging devices in scientific research articles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), pp.1384-1392.
 Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes-Elmsford and Oxford-, 13, 149-149.
 Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT journal, 42(1), pp.37-43.
 Montaud J M . Agricultural Drought Impacts on Crops Sector and Adaptation Options in Mali: a Macroeconomic Computable General Equilibrium Analysis[J]. Working papers of CATT, 2019.
 Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic Writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20, pp.83-102.
 Yang, Y. (2013). Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), pp.23-36.