Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Medical Science Research, 2023, 5(1); doi: 10.25236/FMSR.2023.050115.

Research progress on nasopalatine canal type and its relationship with central incisor position

Author(s)

Wanyu Zhu, Jie Yang, Jing Nie

Corresponding Author:
Jing Nie
Affiliation(s)

Department of Orthodontics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Stomatological Hospital), Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China

Abstract

In recent years, the study of planting technology has received extensive attention and has achieved remarkable results at present. For example, implants are used to restore missing teeth and microimplants are used to adduct anterior teeth with large absolute anchorage to achieve satisfactory orthodontic treatment. However, in clinical practice, whether in the process of restorative treatment or orthodontic treatment, due to the existence of nasopalatine canal, an important bony tubular structure, it increases the risk of implant failure in anterior maxilla implant therapy; it also increases the risk of root resorption caused by excessive anterior adduction and root invasion of nasopalatine canal during orthodontic treatment[1] . Based on this, this paper systematically combs, summarizes and reviews the research status of the nasopalatine canal and its position with the central incisors in recent years in order to provide reference and enlightenment for subsequent researchers.

Keywords

Nasopalatine canal; central incisors; dental root resorption; implants; perforation

Cite This Paper

Wanyu Zhu, Jie Yang, Jing Nie. Research progress on nasopalatine canal type and its relationship with central incisor position. Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 1: 81-85. https://doi.org/10.25236/FMSR.2023.050115.

References

[1] Yu J H, Nguyen T, Kim Y I, et al. Morphologic changes of the incisive canal and its proximity to incisor roots after maxillary tooth movement [J]. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2022, 161 (3): 396-403. e1

[2] Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography [J]. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2014, 36 (8): 805-812.

[3] Hong S Y, Shin J W, Hong C, et al. Alveolar bone remodeling during maxillary incisor intrusion and retraction [J]. Progress in orthodontics, 2019, 20 (1): 1-8.

[4] Al-Amery S M, Nambiar P, Jamaludin M, et al. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of placing anatomical variations when immediate implants [J]. PloS one, 2015, 10 (2): e0117251

[5] Yu J H, Nguyen T, Kim Y I, et al. Morphologic changes of the incisive canal and its proximity to incisor roots after maxillary tooth movement [J]. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2022, 161 (3): 396-403. e1

[6] Casmediate P L, Donner M, Pascarelli B, et al. Immediate dental implant failure associated with nasopalatine duct cyst [J]. Implant Dentistry, 2008, 17 (2): 169-175.

[7] Alkanderi A, Al Sakka Y, Koticha T, et al. Incidence of nasopalatine perforation in relation to virtual implant canal placement: A cone beam computed tomography study [J]. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2020, 22 (1): 77-83.

[8] Du Xizhe, Yang Yutian. Observation and Measurement of Incisor Foramen and Incisor Canal in Chinese [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Medical Edition), 1984 (03): 291-294.

[9] Bornstein M M, Balsiger R, Sendi P, et al. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 patients using sequential limited cone ‐ beam computed tomography [J]. Clinical oral implants research, 2011, 22 (3): 295-301.

[10] Sekerci A E, Buyuk S K, Cantekin K. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of the morphological characterization of the nasopalatine canal in a pediatric population [J]. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2014, 36 (9): 925-932.

[11] Li Xiaomin, Yang Xiaoyu, Liang Yiming, Bao Lijie, Chen Jingwen. Cone beam CT study of anatomical morphology of nasopalatine canal in 200 normal adults [J]. Guangdong Dental Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 23 (05): 241-246.

[12] Haken S, Magat G. Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a Turkish population by cone beam computed tomography [J]. Folia Morphologica, 2018, 77 (3): 527-535.

[13] Wu Lianjun, Yao Li Tao, Zhang Caixia, Liu Chuantong. CBCT measurement analysis of morphological characteristics of incisor canals [J]. Stomatological Research, 2020, 36 (07): 693-697.

[14] Arnaut A, Milanovic P, Vasiljevic M, et al. The Shape of Nasopalatine Canal as a Therapeutic Mining Factor in Movement Approach for Orthodontic Teeth — A CBCT Study [J]. Diagnostics, 2021, 11 (12): 2345

[15] Milanovic P, Vasiljevic M. Gender Differences in the Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Anterior Maxillary Bone-CBCT Study [J]. Serbian Journal of Experimental Differences and Clinical Research, 2021.

[16] Baši I, Orhan M, Kervancıo ğlu P, et al. Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal images on cone beam computed tomography [J]. Folia morphologica, 2019, 78 (1): 153-162.

[17] Sudheer A, Rani K, Kumari A, et al. Morphological variation of the nasopalatine canal: A cone-beam computed tomography study [J]. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology, 2020, 32 (1): 27.

[18] Guo Ming. A CBCT Study of Normal Nasopalatine Canal Anatomy in Urumqi Uygur Population [D]. Xinjiang Medical University, 2019.

[19] Cho E A, Kim S J, Choi Y J, et al. Morphologic evaluation of the incisive canal and its proximity to the central incisors using computed tomography images [J]. The Angle Orthodontist, 2016, 86 (4): 571-576

[20] Gull M A B, Maqbool S, Mushtaq M, et al. Evaluation of morphologic features and proximity of incisive canal to the maxillary central incisors using cone beam computed tomography [J]. IOSR J. Dent. Med. Sci, 2018, 17:46-50.

[21] Dai Jingtao, Li Ping, Li An, Wang Zhen, Tang Youchao. CBCT study on the relationship between incisor canal and root position of maxillary central incisors [J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2014, 23 (22): 1904-1908.

[22] Yan Dong, Shi Yujia, Ge Yue, Inclusive, Xie Ning, Zhu Xianchun. Quantitative study on the relationship between incisor canal and maxillary central incisor position [J]. Stomatology, 2021, 41 (07): 627-630 + 639

[23] Wang Texas. CBCT study on the relationship between incisor canal and maxillary central incisor position in patients with different facial types [D]. Hebei Medical University, 2020

[24] Ke Huafeng, Liu Li, Yuan Ziyi, Liu Valran. CBCT study on the relationship between incisor canal and root position of maxillary central incisors [J Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2018, 34 (03): 385-388

[25] Zheng Yi, Xie Min, Wei Liying. Cone beam computed tomography study of the positional relationship between maxillary central incisors and incisor canals in adult patients with skeletal class II mean angle [J]. Journal of Guangxi Medical University, 2021, 38 (08): 1541-1545

[26] Ni Jieli, Qin Jinwei, Zhang Yang. A study on the positional relationship between maxillary central incisor root and incisor canal in adult patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion [J]. Journal of Nanjing Medical University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 41 (01): 103-108.

[27] Xu Haiyang. Analysis of related limiting factors affecting maxillary central incisor adduction in adult patients with skeletal Class II [D]. Nanjing Medical University, 2019.

[28] Costa E D, de Oliveira Reis L, Gaêta-Araujo H, et al. Comparison of distance of upper central incisor root and incisive canal in different sagittal and skeletal patterns and sex: A retrospective CBCT study [J]. International Orthodontics, 2021, 19 (3): 462-470.