Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Medical Science Research, 2023, 5(3); doi: 10.25236/FMSR.2023.050310.

Research progress of temporomandibular joint in adolescent malocclusion

Author(s)

Yinghao Jing1,2, Peng Yu1,2, Yishan Liu1,2

Corresponding Author:
Yishan Liu
Affiliation(s)

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Preventive Dentistry, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University), Urumqi, 830054, China

2Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Institute of Stomatology, Urumqi, 830054, China

Abstract

The prevalence of malocclusion in permanent dentition was 72.97%. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is one of the most important joints in human body, and its functional structure is the most complex. The shape and position of the temporomandibular joint in patients with malocclusion were affected by occlusal occlusion. This review focuses on the effects of different types of malocclusion on the morphology and function of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in adolescents.

Keywords

Malocclusion, Temporomandibular joint, Condyle

Cite This Paper

Yinghao Jing, Peng Yu, Yishan Liu. Research progress of temporomandibular joint in adolescent malocclusion. Frontiers in Medical Science Research (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 3: 58-62. https://doi.org/10.25236/FMSR.2023.050310.

References

[1] Michelotti A, Iodice g. The role of orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders [J]. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2010, 37(6) : 411-429.

[2] Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth l r, et al. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy [J]. Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the n Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the n Board of Orthodontics, 2000,118(2) : 159-170.

[3] Manfredini D, Stellini E, Gracco A, et al.. Orthodontics is temporomandibular disorder-neutral [J]. The Angle Orthodontist, 2016,86(4) : 649-654.

[4] Armijo-olivo S, Pitance L, Singh V, et al.. Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. Physical Therapy, 2016, 96(1) : 9-25.

[5] Song Zhenglu, Qian Liwen, Cheng Mingjia, Qian Yufen. Comparison of Angle's class I, II ~ 1, II ~ 2, III bony structures of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition with cone beam CT [J]. Shanghai stomatology, 28(02-RRB-2019:141 -147.

[6] Xu Xiaomei. CBCT study of temporomandibular joint characteristics in adolescents and adults with Angle Class II and subclass I [D]. Zhengzhou University, 2019.

[7] Zhou Tao, Qian Yong, Liu Weisong, etc.. The value of CBCT in the measurement of bilateral temporomandibular joint in adolescents [J]. Journal of Oral and maxillofacial prosthetics, 2020, 21(5) : 282-285 + 290.

[8] Burke G, Major P, Glover K, et al. Correlations between condylar characteristics and facial morphology in Class II preadolescent patients [J]. n Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the n Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the n Board of Orthodontics, 1998,114(3) : 328-336.

[9] Li Chen. Three-dimensional analysis of the bony structure of temporomandibular joint in adult female Class II with different vertical facial types D] Fourth Military Medical University, 2016.

[10] Zhao Weiping, Lei Xianhui, Li Lu. A study on the morphological and structural characteristics of temporomandibular joint with different sagittal patterns at the initial stage of permanent dentition [J]. Chinese and foreign medical research, 2018,16(11) : 27-29.

[11] Hasebe A, Yamaguchi T, Nakawaki T, et al.. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle orthod. 2019; 89(2): 306-311.

[12] Ding Yuanfeng, Song Lijuan. Analysis of temporomandibular joint morphology and condyle position in juvenile patients with class II malocclusion [J]. Shanghai stomatology, 2020,29(06) : 656-660.

[13] Ding Y F, Song L J . Evaluations of the morphology and position of condyle and fossa of adolescent temporomandibular joint with Class Ⅱsubdivision malocclusions [J]. Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology, 2020, 29(6):656-660.

[14] Kikuchi K, Takeuchi S, Tanaka E, et al.. Association between condylar position, joint morphology and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients without temporomandibular joint disorders [J]. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2003, 30(11): 1070-1075.

[15] Tecco, SimonaNota, AlessandroCaruso, SilviaPrimozic, JasminaMarzo, GiuseppeBaldini, AlbertoGherlone, Enrico Felice. Temporomandibular clinical exploration in Italian adolescent[J]. Cranio: the journal of craniomandibular practice, 2019, 37(2).

[16] Lin m, Xu y, Wu h, et al.. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint position and morphology in female patients with skeletal class II malocclusion [J]. The Journal of International Medical Research, 2020, 48(2) : 300060519892388.

[17] Gandedkar N H, Shrikantaiah S, Patil a K, et al.. Influence of conventional and skeletal anchorage system supported fixed functional appliance on maxillo-mandibular complex and temporomandibular joint: a preliminary comparative cone beam computed tomography study [J]. International Orthodontics, 2019, 17(2): 256-268.

[18] Elfeky H Y, Fayed M S, Alhammadi m s, et al.. Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance [J]. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, 2018,79(4) : 245-258.

[19] Liu Bowen, Wang Yanmin, song Fang, Liu Min, Duan Ying, Zhou Li. The changes of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients before and after treatment with Twin-block were analyzed by cone beam CT (J). HWASEO Journal of oral medicine, 2013,31(06) : 610-614.

[20] Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Abbaszade H. Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types [J]. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics = Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie: Organ/Official Journal Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Kieferorthopadie, 2016, 77(5) : 350-356.

[21] Xu Jing, Zhu Shuanglin, Pan Yu, Peng Wenbo, Wang Yang. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of cranio-maxillofacial structures in class II malocclusion [J]. Chinese Journal of practical dentistry, 8(05)2015:290-293.

[22] Wen L, Yan W, Yue Z, et al.. Study of Condylar Asymmetry in Angle Class III Malocclusion with Mandibular Deviation [J]. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2015, 26(3) : e264-268.

[23] Yu J, Hu y, Huang M, et al.. A three-dimensional analysis of skeletal and dental characteristics in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry [J]. Journal of X-ray Science and Technology, 2018, 26(3): 449-462.

[24] Marissa, Zhang Ning, Zhang Ning, etc. . Analysis of the shape of temporomandibular fossa in patients with skeletal class I malocclusion and class II malocclusion based on cone beam CT [J]. Chinese Journal of practical dentistry, 2022,15(4) : 429 -435.

[25] Xu Xin, Ji Changrong. A study of the position of the joint fovea in different bone morphologies [J]. Journal of Modern Oral Medicine, 2002, (1) : 60-61.

[26] Guy Yun, Jiang Zhiyue, Liu Shu, Zheng Zhijun. Correlation Analysis of condylar position with sex and craniofacial bone morphology in adolescent malocclusion patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022,20(01) : 42 -47.

[27] Poluha R L, Cunha C O, Bonjardim L R, et al. . Temporomandibular joint morphology does not influence the presence of arthralgia in patients with disk displacement with reduction: A magnetic resonance imaging-based study [J]. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 2020, 129(2): 149-157.

[28] Jasinevicius T R, Pyle M A, Lalumandier J A, et al. . Asymmetry of the articular eminence in dentate and partially edentulous populations [J]. Cranio: The Journal of Craniomandibular Practice, 2006, 24(2): 85-94.

[29] Lobo F, Tolentino E DE S, Iwaki L C V, et al. . Imaginology Tridimensional Study of Temporomandibular Joint Osseous Components According to Sagittal Skeletal Relationship, Sex, and Age [J]. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2019,30(5) : 1462-1465.

[30] De Kanter R J A M, Battistuzzi P g f C M, Truin G-J. Temporomandibular Disorders: “Occlusion” Matters [J]. Pain Research & Management, 2018,2018:8746858.

[31] Khetani M A, Collett B R, Speltz m L, et al. . Health-related quality of life in children with hemifacial microsomia: Parent and Child Perspectives [J]. Journal of Developmental and behavioral pediatrics: JDBP, 2013, 34(9) : 661-668.

[32] Rakhshan V. Congenitally missing teeth (Hypodontia): a review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment [J]. Dental Research Journal, 2015,12(1) : 1-13.

[33] Macr ̈ M, Murmura G, Scarano A, et al.. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and its association with malocclusion in children: a transversal study [J]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022, 10: 860833.

[34] Aidar L , Dominguez G C , Yamashita H K , et al. Changes in temporomandibular joint disc position and form following Herbst and fixed orthodontic treatment.[J]. The Angle Orthodontist, 2010, 80(5):843-852.