Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Environment & Earth Science, 2023, 5(3); doi: 10.25236/AJEE.2023.050302.

Summary of research methods for porosity and permeability of coalbed methane reservoir

Author(s)

Mao Fanjing1,2, Lu Bingkun1,2, Bai Qian1,2

Corresponding Author:
Mao Fanjing
Affiliation(s)

1School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, China

2Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, China

Abstract

In order to serve the research on the physical properties of coalbed methane reservoirs and improve the prediction effect of porosity and permeability of coal reservoirs, this paper, based on a large number of literature research, summarizes the concepts, influencing factors and prediction methods of coal seam porosity and permeability. The research shows that the main factors affecting the porosity of coalbed methane reservoir are coal petrographic composition, metamorphic degree, coal body structure and buried depth, compaction, tectonism, etc; The main influencing factors of permeability include component content, coal rank, coal body structure and in-situ stress, buried depth of coal seam, natural fracture of coal seam, matrix shrinkage, Klinkenberg effect, etc. The porosity prediction of coalbed methane reservoir generally adopts true and apparent relative density method, in addition, there are multiple regression method based on logging information, nuclear magnetic resonance logging method, etc; The measurement methods of CBM reservoir permeability mainly include the calculation method based on conventional logging, triaxial stress experimental research method, joint prediction method of nuclear magnetic resonance and electrical imaging logging, dynamic data analysis method and numerical simulation method. The development of coal seam porosity and permeability prediction technology needs innovative breakthroughs in hardware and software.

Keywords

Coalbed methane; Porosity; Permeability; Influencing factors; Prediction methods

Cite This Paper

Mao Fanjing, Lu Bingkun, Bai Qian. Summary of research methods for porosity and permeability of coalbed methane reservoir. Academic Journal of Environment & Earth Science (2023) Vol. 5 Issue 3: 7-12. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJEE.2023.050302.

References

[1] Zhao Junlong, Chi Jiawei. Review and prospect of factors affecting the physical properties of coalbed methane reservoirs and prediction methods [J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020, 35 (01): 272-280

[2] Hou Junsheng. Coal bed gas reservoir logging evaluation method and its application [M]. Metallurgical Industry Press, 2000

[3] Hou Ruiyun. Characteristics of porosity and relative permeability of coal reservoirs and their measurement methods [J]. Petroleum Experimental Geology, 1996

[4] Luo Yingdu, Zhu Chunsheng. How to correctly calculate the porosity of coal [J]. Coal Quality Technology, 1994 (04): 30-36

[5] Huang Ting, Liu Zheng. Analysis of pore structure characteristics and influencing factors of massive coal reservoirs in Yushe-Wuxiang area [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47 (07): 227-233

[6] Wang Mingshou, Tang Dazhen, Zhang Shanghu. Research status and significance of coal reservoir porosity [J]. China Coalbed Methane, 2004

[7] Zhang Hui. Genetic types of coal pores and their research [J]. Journal of Coal, 2001 (01): 40-44

[8] Xu Qilu, Huang Wenhui, Tang Shuheng, et al. Pore structure and adsorption of deep medium-high coal reservoirs [J]. Modern Geology, 2016, 30 (02): 413-419

[9] Huang Qiang, Fu Xuehai, Zhang Qinghui, et al. Research on overburden porosity and permeability test of medium-high rank coal reservoirs in Qinshui Basin [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47 (06): 164-170

[10] Shi Chaoqun, Xu Anming, Wei Hongxing, Hu Chunlei, Zhang Xing, Zhang Wen, Mo Tao, Zhang Huifang, Zhou Lu, Shi Lingling, Zhu Wenhui, Chen Weili. Quantitative characterization of the damage degree of tectonic compression to clastic rock reservoirs - taking the Jurassic Ahe Formation of the Ikyk structural belt in the Kuqa depression as an example [J]. Journal of Petroleum, 2020, 41 (02): 205-215

[11] Ye Jianping, Shi Baosheng, Zhang Chuncai. Permeability of coal reservoirs in China and its main influencing factors [J]. Journal of Coal, 1999, (02): 3-5

[12] Zhang Rui. Research on logging evaluation method of coalbed methane reservoir [D]. Jilin University, 2016

[13] Fu Xuehai, Jiang Bo, Qin Yong, et al. Use logging curves to divide coal body structure and predict coal reservoir permeability [J]. Logging Technology, 2003 (02): 140-143+177

[14] Qin Yong. Research progress and analysis of coalbed methane genesis and reservoir physical properties abroad [J]. Geoscience Front, 2005 (03): 289-298

[15] Zheng Han, Liu Kaide, Li Xiaolong, et al. Research progress on pore and fracture structure and permeability of coal reservoirs based on NMR and CT [J]. Science and Technology Innovation, 2020, (34): 64-67

[16] Li Peichao, Kong Xiangyan, Zeng Qinghong, et al. Summary and analysis of factors affecting coal seam permeability [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, (05): 45-49+8-7

[17] Guo Heng. Research progress of coal porosity measurement method [J]. Energy Technology and Management, 2018, 43 (01): 1-3

[18] Lin Yongfu. Also on the formula for calculating the porosity of coal with true and apparent relative density [J]. Guangxi Coal, 1998, 16 (4): 36-37

[19] Yu Zhaolin, Wang Yanbin, Yu Yun, et al. Deep coal reservoir porosity logging prediction model based on multiple regression [J]. Inner Mongolia Coal Economy, 2020 (01): 24-25

[20] Yao Yanbin, Liu Daman, Cai Yidong, et al. Fine quantitative characterization of pores and fractures of coal based on NMR and X-CT [J]. Science of China: Earth Science, 2010, 40 (11): 1598-1607

[21] Liang Xiao, Wang Shan, Zhou Mingshun, et al. Evaluation of coal reservoir porosity based on nuclear magnetic resonance and resistivity logging [J]. Coal Engineering, 2017, 49 (08): 130-133

[22] Bo Dongmei, Zhao Yongjun, Jiang Lin. Research methods and main influencing factors of coal reservoir permeability [J]. Oil and Gas Geology and Recovery, 2008 (01): 18-21+112

[23] Ping Haitao, Qin Ruibao, Sun Jianmeng, et al. Porosity spectrum analysis of electrical imaging logging and its application in permeability evaluation of complex reservoirs [J/OL]. Geophysical progress, 2020 (12):1-9 

[24] Tang Dazhen, Zhao Junlong, Xu Hao, Li Zhiping, Tao Shu, Li Song. Material and energy dynamic balance mechanism of medium-high rank coalbed methane system [J]. Journal of Coal, 2016, 41 (01): 40-48

[25] Xia Peng, Zeng Fangui, Wu Jing, Wang Jin, Feng Shaosheng. Division of drainage and production stages and permeability changes of middling coal rank coalbed methane wells [J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 40 (06): 115-123

[26] Chen Zhenhong, Chen Yanpeng, Yang Jiaosheng, et al. Dynamic permeability characteristics of high-rank coalbed methane reservoir and its impact on coalbed methane production [J]. Journal of Petroleum, 2010, 31 (06): 966-969+974

[27] Wang Fujun, Zhang Yachao, Dou Chengyi, et al. Analysis of permeability and key controlled factors of Dafosi low-rank coal-gas reservoir [J]. Coal Mine Safety, 2019, 50 (11): 154-157

[28] Fu Yu, Guo Xiao, Jia Ying, et al. A new mathematical model for the effect of coal matrix shrinkage on fracture permeability [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, (02): 143-145+218

[29] Zhang Yao, Zhao Junlong. Identification of coal body structure based on geo physical logging and its impact on CBM mining [J]. Mineral Exploration, 2020, 11 (10): 2194-2200