Academic Journal of Environment & Earth Science, 2023, 5(3); doi: 10.25236/AJEE.2023.050306.
Liqi Zhou1, Min Wang2
1Department of Business Administration (CIMA), Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, China
2Econometrics, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, China
With the continuous progress of human society, global warming has gradually become a global environmental problem. The main cause of global warming is the greenhouse effect, i.e., rising carbon concentration. Forests and related forest products play an important role in alleviating the greenhouse effect and realizing carbon sequestration. In order to further explore the impact of forest management plan on its carbon sequestration capacity, this paper took pinus koraiensis and fir of the Lesser Khingan Mountains as examples, and implemented the cutting and non-cutting plans respectively with 160 years as a cycle, and calculated its carbon sequestration by the method of Biomass Conversion Factor. The results showed that the carbon storage capacity of cutting in one cycle is 22,290 t more than that of non-cutting, and the carbon sequestration capacity of pinus koraiensis and fir is 104,715 t and 86,757 t respectively under the cutting plan. This paper can provide reference for balancing the relationship among forest economic value, biodiversity and carbon sink storage and optimizing forest management plan.
Carbon Sequestration, The Method of Biomass Conversion Factor, Forest Management, The Lesser Khingan Mountains
Liqi Zhou, Min Wang. Research on Forest Carbon Storage Capacity Based on the Method of Biomass Conversion Factor. Academic Journal of Environment & Earth Science (2023) Vol. 5 Issue 3: 37-41. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJEE.2023.050306.
[1] Fu Yun, Ma Yonghuan, Liu Yijun, Niu Wenyuan. Research on the development model of low-carbon economy [J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2008, No.103(03): 14-19.
[2] Lei Jieyao. Low-carbon lifestyle on the impact of economic structure [J]. Times Finance, 2016, No.640(30): 299.
[3] Lai Mingdong, Yong Xi, Shi Wenjing. Interpretation model of global warming: greenhouse effect theory and natural fluctuation hypothesis of climate [J]. Research on Dialectics of Nature, 2022, 38(05): 69-74+95. doi: 10.19484/J.CNKi.1000-8934.2022.05.010.
[4] Zhou Hongchun. China low-carbon economy development status and prospects [J]. Science and Technology Herald, 2022, 40(21): 6-12.
[5] Lv Pengfei, Liu Lanlan, Yang Wenzhe, Liu Yu. Research progress of rock wettability measurement methods under carbon storage condition and its effect mechanism on gas-liquid interface [J/OL]. Advances in Geophysics: 1-11[2023-01-15]. http://kns.cn ki. net/ kcms/ detail/ 11. 2982. p. 20221228. 1049. 019.html.
[6] Weng E, Luo Y, Wang W, et al. Ecosystem carbon storage capacity as affected by disturbance regimes: A general theoretical model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 2015, 117(G3).
[7] Zhang Yuan, He Xupeng, Qin Shubing, Hao Youmin. CO2 foam concrete carbon storage potential analysis [J/OL]. Environmental Science: 1-10[2023-01-15]. https://doi.org/10.13227/J. HJKX. 202210180.
[8] Ge Zhipeng. Spatial-temporal change characteristics of forest carbon sink in Zhejiang Province and its driving mechanism analysis [D]. Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, 2021. doi: 10.27756/d. CNKi.GZJ LX.2021.000386.
[9] Herich Ivan. Assessment of forest condition and its development on a sampling set of forest management plans in Slovakia [J]. Lesnícky casopis - Forestry Journal, 2009, 55(2): Team#2204233 Page 19 of 22
[10] Magerl Andreas, Matej Sarah, Kaufmann Lisa, Noë Julia Le, Erb Karlheinz, Gingrich Simone. Forest carbon sink in the U.S. (1870–2012) driven by substitution of forest ecosystem service flows[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2022, 176