Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Education, 2023, 5(12); doi: 10.25236/IJNDE.2023.051211.

Comparative Analysis of the New and Old High School Mathematics Textbooks—Take Version a "Set" as an Example

Author(s)

Haiying Zhong, Chunmei Zhou, Jinhui Dong

Corresponding Author:
Jinhui Dong
Affiliation(s)

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang, Hubei, 438000, China

Abstract

According to Mathematics Curriculum Standards of Regular High School (2017 edition), People's Education Press published the 2019 Regular High School Mathematics textbook version A (hereinafter referred to as the new textbook). The content of the textbook has been adjusted. The knowledge of set is the foundation of modern mathematics, and also the foundation of high school mathematics. This article will take the set part of People’s Education Edition Version A as an example, using literature method, content analysis method, comparison method from the the aspects of textbook system structure, chapter introduction, text content, the summary of this chapter and so on, to analyze and compare the new textbook and the 2004 edition of ordinary high school curriculum standard experimental textbook mathematics A (hereinafter referred to as the old textbook). Therefore, it helps the textbook users to understand the changes and characteristics of the new textbook, and promote the common development of teaching and learning.

Keywords

high school mathematics textbook; set; comparative study

Cite This Paper

Haiying Zhong, Chunmei Zhou, Jinhui Dong. Comparative Analysis of the New and Old High School Mathematics Textbooks—Take Version a "Set" as an Example. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 12: 61-66. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2023.051211.

References

[1] Jing Wang, Dianshun Hu. Analysis and thinking of mathematics history into high school mathematics textbooks—Take the required textbook of human Education version A as an example [C]. //. Proceedings of the 2016 International Academic Annual Conference of the National Mathematics Education Research Association, 2016: 1121-1126. 

[2] Yingyi Xiang, Mingxiu Ye. Comparative analysis of high school mathematics textbooks from the perspective of core literacy—Take solid geometry as an example [J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2021, 36 (08): 25-31 + 52. 

[3] Kun Li. Comparative analysis of the structure and content of the old and new high school mathematics textbooks [D]. Qufu Normal University, 2021. 

[4] Qingchun Yu, Xiaoqin Wang. Concontents and methods of HPM in China [J]. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2022, 31 (04): 49-55. 

[5] Guanghua Shao, Yan Zhang. Characteristic analysis and use suggestions of the new high school mathematics textbook in version A [J]. Curriculum, teaching material. Canon Law, 2019, 39 (12): 109-114. 

[6] Fang-Rong D U, Xiao-Lin L. On the Analysis and Correction of Several Problems in the High School Math Textbooks[J].Journal of Zunyi Normal College, 2010.