College English curriculum construction is the core of college English teaching reform, and evaluation is an effective means to promote and strengthen college English curriculum construction. To organize the evaluation of college English courses, it is necessary to determine the indicators and standards that reflect the quality of the courses, establish a course evaluation organization to implement them, and truly achieve truth-seeking, scientific and fairness. While the popularization of higher education provides more people with the opportunity to receive higher education, the problem of the decline in the quality of personnel training in institutions of higher learning has aroused widespread concern. Curriculum refers to the overall conception of an educational institution to meet the learning needs of students and achieve the desired educational purpose. Curriculum setting is the material content and important guarantee for the implementation and realization of talent training goals, and it is the concrete manifestation of social development needs and school training goals. The teaching goal of college English is to cultivate students' English application ability, enhance cross-cultural communication awareness and communicative ability, and at the same time develop autonomous learning ability, improve comprehensive cultural literacy, and enable them to be effective in study, life, social interaction and future work. Use English to meet national, social, school and personal development needs.

Xiaojing Song. College English Curriculum Setting and Evaluation Based on Language Curriculum Design Model——Taking English Translation Course as an Example. Frontiers in Educational Research (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 2: 47-51. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.050210.

[1] Wenmin, Wu. Study on the Application of Flipped Classroom Based on Micro-class in College English Listening Course[C]// International Conference. 2017:13-17.

[2] Sun T.Wang C. College students' writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language [J]. System, 2020, 90:102221.

[3] Nurshatayeva A.Page L C. Effects of the Shift to English-Only Instruction on College Outcomes: Evidence from Central Asia [J]. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2019, 13(1):1-29.

[4] Jiang Y.Kuo L J. The development of vocabulary and morphological awareness: A longitudinal study with college EFL students [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2019, 40(4):1-27.

[5] Zhang H. The Longitudinal Effect of Morphological Awareness on Higher-order Literacy Skills among College L2 Learners [J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2021, 65(4):101969.

[6] Michelle H.Di X. Are two subjects better than one? The effects of developmental English courses on language minority and native English-speaking students' community college outcomes [J]. Economics of Education Review, 2018, 66:1-13.

[7] Kim, Sangki. Development of discursive practices for the intelligibility of Thai English in interaction: Sequence and categories as contextual resources [J]. System, 2018, 72:164-177.

[8] Zhang X.Ardasheva Y. Sources of college EFL learners' self-efficacy in the English public speaking domain [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2019, 53:47-59.

[9] Karen, D, Thompson. What Blocks the Gate? Exploring Current and Former English Learners' Math Course-Taking in Secondary School [J]. American Educational Research Journal, 2017, 54(4):757-798.

[10] Alvarado S E.Muniz P. Racial and Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Effect of MESA on AP STEM Coursework and College STEM Major Aspirations [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2018, 59(7):1-25.

[11] Si J. An analysis of business English coursebooks from an ELF perspective [J]. ELT Journal, 2019(2):2.