Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2023, 6(7); doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.060708.

Construction of evaluation index system of inquiry teaching in high school mathematics based on analytic hierarchy process

Author(s)

Qingyan Cui

Corresponding Author:
Qingyan Cui
Affiliation(s)

School of Sciences, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226019, China

Abstract

From the perspective of the characteristics of mathematics inquiry learning and experiential learning, it provides innovative ideas for the construction of the evaluation index system of mathematics inquiry teaching in high school. There are three goals in this system: teacher's teaching development, student behavior performance and process factors. And 11 first-level indicators and 31 second-level indicators are constructed. Through the questionnaire survey of experts, the consistency check using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), it determines the weight of indicators, enriches the development of mathematics inquiry teaching theory, and accumulates experience for the research of mathematics inquiry teaching evaluation in high school.

Keywords

mathematics inquiry teaching; experiential learning; evaluation index system; analytic hierarchy process

Cite This Paper

Qingyan Cui. Construction of evaluation index system of inquiry teaching in high school mathematics based on analytic hierarchy process. Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 7: 43-49. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.060708.

References

[1] Wilkie K.J., Sullivan, P. “Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic motivational aspects of middle school students' aspirations for their mathematics learning”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 97, pp. 235-254, 2018.

[2] Zhemin Zhu, Bing Jia. “An attempt to establish SIRA Evaluation Standard for Mathematical Inquiry Teaching”. Mathematics Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 57-60, 2016.

[3] Hongyu Su. “Construction of Mathematical Micro-inquiry Evaluation System Based on Problem Design”. Mathematics Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 19-24, 2019.

[4] Canming Wang, Shuiping Zhu, Trans. “Experiential learning: Let experience be the source of learning and development”. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2008.

[5] Pengwei Li, trans. “Classroom Perspective: Students' Creativity and Problem Acquisition in STEM Deep Learning”. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2020.

[6] Abdulwahed M, Nagy Z.K. “Applying Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education”. Engineering Education, vol. 98, pp. 283-294, 2009.

[7] Wenjiao Qiu, Guang Zhao, Wei Lei. “Evaluation Index System of inquiry-based Classroom Teaching Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process”. Higher Engineering Education Research, vol. 6, pp. 138-142, 2016.

[8] Zhuguang Zhou. “Analysis on the Evaluation Dimension of High School Mathematics Inquiry- based Classroom Teaching from the perspective of Deep Experience”. Chinese Journal of Education, vol. 2, pp. 77-82, 2021.